Putting evaluations to use: from measuring to endorsing social value
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper examines the concept of 'social value', emphasized in the recently implemented Social Value Act. It argues that evaluations can play an important role in advocating the status of social value. Evaluations highlight priorities and interests and can offer an important way of evidencing and promoting social value in order that it becomes an active ingredient in decision-making in the commissioning of public services. This is essential, since the implementation of the Social Value Act is made difficult by the fact that social value is hard to define and that commissioners are presented with goals and priorities that may compete with a focus on social values. This paper elaborates on a set of themes that can help us explore evaluation frameworks with a view to highlighting where and how evaluations can endorse social values, such as social inclusion, as a feature of how public services are delivered by third sector organisations. This, we argue, will be crucial for the Social Value Act to become a meaningful addition to the way public services are procured and commissioned, and for third sector organisations to secure continued public service contracts based on arguments and values that play on their presumed advantages over other service deliverers.
منابع مشابه
Providing a Multidimensional Measurement Model for Assessing Mobile Telecommunication Service Quality (MS-Qual)
Because of the need to develop specific measurement scales for different services industries, this study aimed to empirically develop a reliable and valid model specifically for measuring mobile telecommunication service quality. A multidimensional measurement model (MS-Qual) has been proposed based on an extensive literature review and then, to assess the model validity, convergent and discrim...
متن کاملNew development: the challenges of designing municipal governance indicators
The accentuated interest in the quality of governance along with the idea that ‘what is measured is what matters’ has been endorsing the deployment and use of quantitative governance indicators. Moreover, decentralization and public policies emphasising localism are putting the focus on local governments. This article addresses the challenges of developing indicators and using the information f...
متن کاملAdherence to the CONSORT Statement in the Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials on Pharmacological Interventions Published in Iranian Medical Journals
Background: Among manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) form the backbone of evidence-based medicine. Hence, their protocol should be designed rigorously and their results should be reported clearly. To improve the quality of RCT reporting, researchers developed the CONSORT Statement in 1996 and updated it in 2010. This study was designed to assess th...
متن کاملUSE OF CHOLESTEROL IN THE DIFFERENTIATION OF EXUDATIVE AND TRANSUDATIVE PLEURAL EFFUSION
Light's criteria (protein and LDH) have been used to the present to differentiate exudative pleural effusion from transudative. This is both time consuming and relatively more expensive as compared to measuring cholesterol. During 1992-1993, a prospective study on 70 patients with effusion was carried out measuring fasting LDH, protein, cholesterol, alkaline phosphatase and glucose. All pa...
متن کاملThe Adaptation and Experience of Four Shoulder Patient–Centered Outcome Scores
Objective: The aim of this study was to achieve a reliable tool for measuring health related quality of life among Iranians with shoulder pain and disability. Materials & Methods: Through a non-experimental methodology study, four shoulder patient-centered outcome scores were translated and adapted culturally to Persian language. A total of 126 male and female patients with shoulder pain and...
متن کامل